Infos sourcées - "santé globale" : environnement, biodiversité, climat, santés humaine et animale

2014 10 balance subv pollution autoengland 150397 pixabay mini Lower rates applied by governments to company cars and diesel fuel in the 27 OECD countries & South Africa were a EUR 26.8 billion of foregone tax revenues in 2012.

But under-taxing of company cars in OECD means an overall cost much higher : an additionnal cost of EUR 150 billions follow from the increase of air pollution, carbon emissions, traffic congestions, road accidents and health ailments (EUR 116 billions additionnal annual cost).


The OECD is calling on governments to stop subsidising company cars and to phase out the diesel tax differential.

OECD recently published a report about diesel use and under-taxing which demonstrates the negative impacts of subsidising company cars and diesel tax tax differential (company cars are half of the amount of new cars in European Union and diesel motors are in 55% of new cars).

Besides the EUR 150 billions cost, OECD emphasizes that 33 of 34 OECD countries apply lower taxes to diesel than to petrol and that diesel cars are in the majority in 23 countries. But trafiic is responsible for ~25% of carbon emissions and are the main cause of air pollution.

It is also known for long than cars using diesel fuel are worse for environment and health than those using petrol fuel:

  • + 18% carbon atoms than petrol (per volume unit)
  • more harmful air pollutants (carbon coumpounds, small particles,...)

And company car owners drive up to three times as much as people with private cars, mainly because of  subsides and lower rates taxes (price of diesel and tax reliefs when driving a company car).

The OECD is calling on governments to stop subsidising company cars and to phase out the diesel tax differential.

Subsidising company cars and diesel tax differential are inconsistent with actions aiming to improve air quality and to lower environment footprint, and they also have an heavy impact on public finances! Let's hope that this economic argument will carry weight...

Source

OCDE : Under-taxing the benefits of company cars 

OCDE : The Diesel Differential 

Sciences participatives

Infos "repères"

Infos en cartes

Infos en vidéo

Livres

A lire ailleurs

L'échec des grandes centrales de biomasse

Un rapport publié en décembre 2012 disqualifie la politique énergétique misant sur la biomasse forestière pour produire de l'électricité. Incapables de mobiliser de nouvelles ressources en bois-énergie, les grandes centrales à biomasse fragilisent les filières existantes. Le rapport pointe en revanche le succès des filières locales.

logo novethic à lire sur novethic.fr

More articles [EN]

Think twice about roof racks: added items cost you as much as +25% in gas

england 150397 pixabay mini While you get ready to hit the road this summer, think twice before hitching a roof racks to your car: added items cost you as much as 25% more in gas! In US, the increasing usage of roof racks (+200% in 2040) may turn into a real concern: they already are responsible for almost 1% of fuel consumption.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory researcher Alan Meier and Yuche Chen of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory have estimated the fuel consumption penalty of roof racks.

Lire la suite...

A lire ailleurs

L’Union européenne prépare une bio au rabais

Reporterre s’est procuré le projet de règlement sur l’agriculture biologique que l’Union européenne est sur le point de valider. Et révèle que l’obligation de contrôle annuel a disparu ! Ce qui met en cause le modèle même du bio.

logo reporterreà lire sur reporterre.net